Essays in English Literature 1780-1860, by George Saintsbury
Essays In English Literature 1780-1860, By George Saintsbury. In what instance do you like reviewing a lot? Just what concerning the sort of the publication Essays In English Literature 1780-1860, By George Saintsbury The demands to check out? Well, everybody has their own reason ought to check out some publications Essays In English Literature 1780-1860, By George Saintsbury Primarily, it will certainly associate with their necessity to obtain understanding from guide Essays In English Literature 1780-1860, By George Saintsbury and also want to check out just to get home entertainment. Books, tale book, and also various other enjoyable publications come to be so preferred today. Besides, the scientific books will additionally be the most effective need to select, particularly for the pupils, instructors, doctors, business owner, and various other careers which love reading.
Essays in English Literature 1780-1860, by George Saintsbury
Free PDF Ebook Online Essays in English Literature 1780-1860, by George Saintsbury
"Essays in English Literature 1780-1860" from George Saintsbury. English writer, literary historian, scholar, critic and wine connoisseur (1845-1933).
Essays in English Literature 1780-1860, by George Saintsbury- Published on: 2015-06-16
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 9.00" h x .57" w x 6.00" l, .75 pounds
- Binding: Paperback
- 250 pages
About the Author George Saintsbury (1845-1933) was a journalist, reviewer, critic, editor, and Professor of Literature at the University of Edinburgh. Thomas Pinney is Professor of English Emeritus at Pomona College. Among other books, he is author of "A History of Wine in America "(in two volumes from UC Press).
Where to Download Essays in English Literature 1780-1860, by George Saintsbury
Most helpful customer reviews
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful. " Best to start with some of Saintsbury's wit By Christopher (o.d.c.) "... We have recently seen revived the sempiternal argument between authors and critics—an argument in which it may be as well to say that the present writer has not yet taken part either anonymously or otherwise. The authors, or some of them, have remarked that they have never personally benefited by criticism; and the critics, after their disagreeable way, have retorted that this was obvious."Best to start with some of Saintsbury's wit, because the table of contents is... daunting:INTRODUCTORY ESSAY— The Kinds of Criticism ixI. Crabbe 1II. Hogg 33III. Sydney Smith 67IV. Jeffrey 100V. Hazlitt 135VI. Moore 170VII. Leigh Hunt 201VIII. Peacock 234IX. Wilson 270X. De Quincey 304XI. Lockhart 339XII. Praed 374XIII. Borrow 403APPENDIX— A. De Quincey 440 B. Lockhart 444Some of these poets and essayists, like Crabbe and De Quincey, are also dealt with by Leslie Stephen and Augustine Birrell; but Saintsbury drills down even deeper:"... The greatest of all critics was accused, unjustly, of having a certain dislike of clear, undoubted supremacy. It would be far more fair to say that Sainte-Beuve had eminently, what perhaps all critics who are not mere carpers on the one hand, or mere splashers of superlatives on the other, have more or less—an affection for subjects possessing but qualified merit, and so giving to criticism a certain additional interest in the task of placing and appraising them."This book did take a long time to read. And another name for 'drilling down' is 'boring.' But I will give one more sample of Saintsbury at his best:Indeed, the truth is that while this attitude has in some periods been very rare, it cannot be said to be the peculiar, still less the universal, characteristic of any period. It is a personal not a periodic distinction; and there are persons who might make out a fair claim to it even in the depths of the Middle Ages or of the nineteenth century. However this may be, Peacock certainly held the theory of those who take life easily, who do not love anything very much except old books, old wine, and a few other things, not all of which perhaps need be old, who are rather inclined to see the folly of it than the pity of it, and who have an invincible tendency, if they tilt at anything at all, to tilt at the prevailing cants and arrogances of the time. These cants and arrogances of course vary. The position occupied by monkery at one time may be occupied by physical science at another; and a belief in graven images may supply in the third century the target, which is supplied by a belief in the supreme wisdom of majorities in the nineteenth. But the general principles—the cult of the Muses and the Graces for their own sake, and the practice of satiric archery at the follies of the day—appear in all the elect of this particular election, and they certainly appear in Peacock.
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. Four Stars By Luong Good because for free.
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. Five Stars By Amazon Customer Great book
See all 3 customer reviews... Essays in English Literature 1780-1860, by George SaintsburyEssays in English Literature 1780-1860, by George Saintsbury PDF
Essays in English Literature 1780-1860, by George Saintsbury iBooks
Essays in English Literature 1780-1860, by George Saintsbury ePub
Essays in English Literature 1780-1860, by George Saintsbury rtf
Essays in English Literature 1780-1860, by George Saintsbury AZW
Essays in English Literature 1780-1860, by George Saintsbury Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar